Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 21.06.2025 19:48

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Bank of America predicts major housing market changes are coming soon - TheStreet
What’s next?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
As an inmate did you have to live alongside a bully for your whole sentence?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why is China the first in the world to counter the "reciprocal tariff"?